<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Surveillance on Ian&#39;s (not so) technical blog</title>
    <link>https://preview-www.0x69616e.com/tags/surveillance/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Surveillance on Ian&#39;s (not so) technical blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Ian Wilson.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:26:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://preview-www.0x69616e.com/tags/surveillance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Employee Surveillance Fosters Mistrust</title>
      <link>https://preview-www.0x69616e.com/posts/employee-surveillance-fosters-mistrust/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:26:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://preview-www.0x69616e.com/posts/employee-surveillance-fosters-mistrust/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A new &lt;a href=&#34;https://crackedlabs.org/en/data-work/publications/securityriskprofiling&#34;&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; titled &amp;ldquo;Employees as Risks&amp;rdquo; - released today by the Vienna-based non-profit &lt;a href=&#34;https://crackedlabs.org/&#34;&gt;crackedlabs&lt;/a&gt; - explores software from Microsoft and formerly from Forcepoint – specifically SIEM (security information and event management) and UEBA (user and entity behavior analytics) applications. This study, part of an ongoing series of reports on the Surveillance and Digital Control at Work, examine the way in which expansive information gathering in the workplace turns employees into suspects. As the report points out, employee surveillance fosters mistrust, may be disproportionate, and comes with potential problems like false positives and inaccuracies.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
